Friday, October 26, 2012

special feature: Consolation Prize: The Game Console Is Dead ...

Gaming consoles have never found their very existence more threatened.
Illustration: Simon Lutrin/Wired

In November, Nintendo will release Wii U, the first update to the groundbreaking motion-controlled gaming console that took the industry by storm in 2006. Pundits and developers presume Sony and Microsoft will quickly follow suit with their own updated game consoles ? also the first in years ? though neither have confirmed it.

Assuming all of these new machines arrive as predicted, they?ll hit store shelves at nearly the exact moment when the venerable game console, and the business model that sustained it, became obsolete.

Discuss on WiredExtraIn the history of videogames, devices designed primarily to play games have dominated more versatile machines by offering more software and a significantly better gaming experience.

The last generation of devices has been bigger than any previous one. Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo combined have moved over 225 million home game consoles since their launches in 2005 and 2006. That?s a stunning success, especially when you consider the consoles were just a Trojan horse for the real business of selling billions of game titles at a wallet-thinning $40 to $60 a pop.

And that?s not all. In predictions about the race to own the living room, disrupt cable television and remake the entire entertainment industry, consoles often figure near the top of the list. Microsoft crows repeatedly that its Xbox platform, though not its biggest money maker, is probably its greatest success since Windows 95 and Office.

Nearly seven years have elapsed since Xbox got an update ? an eternity in hardware manufacturing. In that time, the $67 billion worldwide game business has shifted radically, forcing far-reaching changes in everything from pricing, game design, distribution, audience expectations and devices.

Anticipating the shifting sands for consoles, Microsoft this week unveiled a slate of new features for Xbox that aim to turn it into a new type of entertainment platform with hooks to mobile devices, cheap gaming apps, video streaming and music ? a move that comes even as it is poised to release the latest sequel in its blockbuster Halo franchise. The dual message couldn?t more clear: Consoles are bigger than ever, and they need to change immediately, or die.

???Consoles, in terms of the way that they???ve been operating and failing to evolve, have to change,??? says Mark Kern, head of the game developer Red 5 Studios. ???The console model is hamstrung by the whole box-model mentality, the idea that you pay $60 for a game and you go play.???

The most obvious disruptor has been mobile apps, which offer pretty good game play on cellphones and tablets for one-tenth or less the price of console games, and very often for free. Other trends include the explosion of social gaming, also mostly free, and the resurgence of PC games, which are now typically cheaper and more flexible than console games, tapping into new online distribution platforms that make them far more convenient to purchase.

None of the game industry insiders Wired interviewed for this story were ready to call the age of the consoles well and truly over. Cinematic graphics, intense play, stories with the narrative sweep and character development of a well-crafted novel: These will keep the fans coming, most argued, in smaller numbers, perhaps, but just as devotedly as ever. At the same time, all of the companies they work for are well underway with plans for radical overhaul, signaling a clear understanding of what is coming ? and more to the point, what has already arrived in the market full force.

The videogame console as we???ve always known it actually died a few years ago. It keeled over somewhere around the time that Microsoft redesigned the Xbox 360???s user interface so you had to tab through ?Bing,? ???Home,??? ???Social??? and ???Video??? before you got to the tab marked ???Games.??? Ever since, the big three makers have been bending over backward to show that their boxes aren???t just dumb game players but connected everything-machines that play more Hulu than Halo.

The pressure to evolve even further has become immense now that the quality gap between cheap-or-free games and full-price ones is narrowing. The best iPad games look like middle-of-the-road Xbox 360 games. Your smartphone is quickly getting to the point where its hardware could display good-looking games in 1080p on your television, and it won???t be long before your phone and TV can sync up without cables.

The result: Years from now, 225 million devices will almost certainly be seen as the point at which the console business peaked. Gamers are going elsewhere for their fix. The console???s time at the top of the heap is drawing to an end, and these machines won???t survive without radical change.

???Everybody who is paying attention is seeing the tectonic plates under the game industry shifting pretty dramatically,??? says David Reid of CCP Games, which is bringing a free-to-play shooter called Dust 514 to Sony???s PlayStation 3. ???The core model is eroding.???

Consoles used to do everything best, but those strengths are now being wiped away. Unlike PC games, which may require finicky custom settings, consoles ???just work,??? fans have long pointed out. Well, so does the iPad. Consoles are cheaper than PCs? Not when you factor in the growing disparity in game prices. Consoles have all the good content? Well, if you want Nintendo- or Sony-exclusive games, you???ll need to buy their hardware. But for many gamers, Angry Birds is becoming more attractive than Mario.

The ripple effects, if you can call a giant tsunami a ripple, are already washing over the game industry. These days, makers of high-end console games need to sell more and more copies, at higher and higher prices, because triple-A game development is getting exponentially more expensive. That?s creating sticker shock for fans, who are increasingly being asked to pay far more than the standard $60 to absorb crippling development costs. Game publishing giant Ubisoft???s plan to squeeze $150 out of its most diehard Assassin???s Creed III players on day one is typical: $120 for a ???limited edition??? game package and $30 for a ???season pass??? of downloadable extra game content, to be drip-fed over the next year.

Gaming aficionados will pay up, they say, because the bigger games are of higher quality. But only a handful of developers can now afford to play in this rarefied and risky space, and even for these few, the returns will be smaller. The new leaders in the game, insiders predict, will be those who can shift resources into less ambitious, higher-return products, leaving the future of high-end games in serious doubt over the long haul.

???In game design,??? says Red 5???s Kern, ???the optimal strategy for any game tends to fall to the player known as the min-maxer. A min-maxer quickly finds the advantageous parts of the game and optimizes by dumping all of their gold, all of their skill points into the things that allow them to win the game. And they put nothing into the other stuff.???

???Game companies can???t have it both ways. They???ve got to min-max.???


Source: http://www.bethegamer.com/2012/10/26/special-feature-consolation-prize-the-game-console-is-dead-what-will-replace-it/

how to make it in america how to make it in america schweddy balls schweddy balls bill conlin kendall jenner plane crash

Around the Web?

Friday’s recommended reads are waiting for you: FDA warns eye drops and nasal sprays could be harmful to kids ?CBS News Double trouble! Halloween costume ideas for siblings ? Yahoo! Shine N.Y.C. mom comes homes to find nanny fatally stabbed two children ? PEOPLE.com What’s the proper etiquette for waiting in line with kids? ? [...]

Source: http://feeds.celebritybabies.com/~r/celebrity-babies/~3/VAPttGiY7sE/

askew blue moon eddie murphy ann romney marco rubio marco rubio farrah abraham

The God of the Bible Knows Nothing About Modern Psychology and ...

A study done by Nicholas Epley from the University of Chicago tells us all believers think God agrees with what they do about a host of non-related issues. We know this. And it's dangerous. If this study shows us anything at all it should make believers less certain of what they pontificate about. In fact, this study falsifies faith itself, for there is no independent way to determine what God thinks, if he exists at all. Believers simply create their own religion, their own Gospel, and their own God in their own image.

There is something else, a few corollaries that need highlighted. What believers think about God is also what believers think that God thinks about God. Why not? Not only this, but what believers think about God is dependent on what they think of their parents and themselves to a large degree. The real causes of one's beliefs are almost never addressed and since that's the case believers cannot offer real solutions because they aren't to be found in the Bible. In the Bible people who are selfish, unruly, prideful, lustful, divisive, unforgiving, doubting, lazy, liars, disobedient, un-pure in heart, and who cannot love their enemies, are simply told not be like that. [Yes, yes, I know, the New Testament promises God's Holy Spirit to help, but if that's the case then why didn't he communicate his will more effectively so that eight million Christians would not have slaughtered themselves during and after the Protestant Reformation?] In any case, I think this can be tested when it comes to the supposed "spiritual gifts" Christians claim to have been given by their God.

First, I'll grant that faith is self-fulfilling such that someone who was raised to feel guilty or raised to loathe themselves that personal faith can help them. It doesn't matter what kind of benevolent or forgiving or gracious God they had faith in though. That's why believers will forever struggle with their faith because it has to overcome how they were raised. That's why some believers are optimists while others are pessimistic, why some have little trouble believing while others forever struggle with it, while some feel forgiven while others always feel guilty, why some believers view God as a harsh judge while others picture a jolly Santa Claus, why some believers hate anyone who argues against their faith (after all, doesn't God?) while others love non-believers and wish to help them, why some Christians like the Old Testament while others like the New Testament, while some like picturing non-believers in hell while others deny the existence of hell or mitigate its horrors, and the list goes on and on. But whatever believers think of God or themselves they think God shares that same view. For some believers this is tragic. For others it's liberating, and there are various responses in between. The real causes of one's beliefs about God or themselves are almost never addressed, and since that's the case they cannot offer real lasting solutions.

Believers have psychological problems due to the experiences they have had in life. Only psychological probing can offer lasting healing. A person who has trouble with faith doesn't need a Bible verse. He or she needs to understand why trusting is a problem for him or her. A stingy person doesn't need to be told to tithe. He or she needs to know why security is a problem. A hateful person doesn't need to just hear the parable of the Good Samaritan. He or she needs to understand where his hatred comes from.

That's why preachers like Joel Osteen are so successful even though evangelicals are not happy he doesn't preach "true" doctrine. It's because he's offering some real solutions to the problems that afflict people, including believers. He merely uses the Bible as a platform for offering some good psychological advice that people could get from listening to Dr. Phil (although they both annoy me). Preachers who preach "true" doctrine alienate their people with guilt, with hate, with self-loathing, and fear.

So let's test this. Take for example the lists of "spiritual gifts" in the New Testament:


Most of these aren't "miraculous" gifts given by God even on Christian terms, and I think none of them are. God doesn't give these gifts. People gain them mostly by their upbringing. Identifying them is merely identifying who you are. I'd like just once for evidence that a person who was brought up to be stingy to have the gift of giving, or a shy unassuming person who was given the gift of leadership, or dense person without common sense or education given the gift of teaching, and so forth.

Folks this just does not happen, ever!

Where the Bible does help believers it's self-fulfilling because of one's faith, or based on what anyone could figure out for themselves without it. But it offers no real solutions to the problems that afflict people because modern psychology had not yet arisen. In the Bible the only solution offered to people is to have faith in God, in his Word, and/or in the Holy Spirit--self-fulfilling things like that.

The Book of Proverbs might be thought of as the exception but the practical advice in it could be figured out by anyone without divine inspiration at all. It only talks about the consequences of one's actions and why doing bad things will not be good for one's future. It doesn't speak to why we are who we are and how to fix that.

In the Bible God knows nothing about modern psychology. I wonder why? Why is it there is nothing in the advice offered in the Bible except that which was understood by the ancient people of that time? Oh, I know. It's the same reason why Martians who visited us never spoke about anything but current events: That Which Disconfirms UFOs From Mars Also Disconfirms God?s Existence

Source: http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-god-of-bible-knows-nothing-about.html

1000 words ron white ron white buckyballs buckyballs awake mario batali

Razer's gaming tablet drops by the FCC, leaves handles at home

Razer's gaming tablet drops by the FCC, leaves handles at home

Looking for a gaming tablet you can really grab? Don't look at the latest FCC filings then -- Federal regulators appear to have snagged some exclusive hands-on time with Razer's upcoming Project Fiona, and its trademark handlebars are nowhere in sight. The nunchuck-esque controllers we saw at CES didn't make it in the FCC's label location outline (seen above), but an attached accessory list makes note of a Razer-branded controller, powered by a 2800mAh battery, hinting that this prototype's gamepads might well be independent or detachable. The same document lists a 5600mAh battery for the tablet itself, as well as a model number: RZ09-0093.

The Federal documents show a heavily redesigned device, falling in line with Razer's recent community campaign: CEO Min-Liang Tan has been asking fans to help design Project Fiona on his Facebook page. Over the past several weeks, the community has weighed in on accessories, price, CPU / GPU configurations and more. This FCC prototype may not be the final design, but if nothing else, it's proof that the device is evolving. Check out the Government's inside scoop for yourself at the source link below.

Filed under: ,

Razer's gaming tablet drops by the FCC, leaves handles at home originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:41:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceFCC  | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/24/Razer-fiona-fcc/

michael mcdonald jon jones vs rashad evans earth day 2012 jon jones rashad evans ufc jones vs evans watergate mlb

Alternative Business Structures (ABS) ? High Street and Specialist ...

Founder member of Core Legal David Mort, Co-owner and Director of IRN Research, looks at the progress of ABS so far and notes the significant number of high street and specialist law firms adopting the ABS model.

?

In advance of the ABS launch earlier this year, many felt that big brands from outside the legal market would use the ABS model to enter the legal sector. So far, these big brands have largely been conspicuous by their absence, with the exception of the Co-op which was already offering legal services (and brands like the AA and Saga plus one or two insurance companies which have signalled their intentions to become ABS).

By October 2012, around 30 ABSs had been licensed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and another 150 or so were waiting for a decision on their license. There have also been another 11 specialist conveyancing ABSs licensed by the Council for Licensed Conveyancers.?The 30 licensed so far are a mix of high street firms, volume legal providers, new start-ups, and niche law firms but there are as many medium and smaller law firms becoming ABSs as there are larger firms.

If there is a threat to high street legal from ABS, it is so far coming from established law firms like Irwin Mitchell and Russell Jones & Walker (plus the Co-op) which will use ABS, and external investment, to grow their volume personal injury and other consumer law businesses. Irwin Mitchell has just announced that it will embark on its first TV ad campaign this year to boost brand awareness.

There are likely to be some ?big brands? in the remaining 150 ABS applications but we can also expect the mix of licences to continue to mirror the pattern set in the first 30, with more high street and specialist law firms taking the plunge.

?

Licensed ABSs, October 2012

?

Large established law firms

Bott & Co
Franklins
Irwin Mitchell
Plexus Law
Russell Jones & Walker
Winkwood Sherwood

All, apart from Franklins, are top 200 law firms. Already, all have leading positions in the personal injury market and will use the ABS model to grow business.

General practice medium law firms
JCP Solicitors
John Welch & Stammers Solicitors
Langley Wellington

John Welch and Langley Wellington are using the ABS model to allow a non-lawyer director to become a partner. JCP ? converted from LDP.?

Specialist law firms
Abbis Cadres (employment)
Boyle Leonard Wilden (criminal law)
Isadore Goodman (insolvency)
NAS Legal (advocacy services in court)
Parchment Law (will writers)
Plain Law Solicitors (niche property law)
Strata Solicitors (liability claims for insurers)
TPP Law (public sector law)
Tracy Miller Family Law

Mainly using ABS model to allow non-lawyer employees or relatives to become partners.

Medium/smaller personal injury law firms
Accident Advice Solicitors
Amelans
Kayes Solicitors
Mulderrigs Solicitors
New Law Solicitors

The first 2 law firms (and Mulderrigs) are bringing various non-lawyer employees into business as partners, e.g. Marketing Director, Accountant, partner?s wife. Kayes relaunching as Pudsey Law and moving from PI into other practice areas. New Law developing white label service.

Big Brands
Cooperative Legal Services

Already a ?30m+ legal business and just expanded into family law.

Start-ups/new businesses
AAG Legal Services
Crabtree Law
Red Bar Law
Thinking Legal

AAG ? private client services and 2 non-lawyer shareholders; Crabtree Law ? new business set up by Crabtree Property Management;? Red Bar Law ? panel of 120 barristers with fixed-fee advice; Thinking Legal ? 2-person commercial law firm looking for partnerships with others.

Others
Lawbridge Solicitors
Nicola Phillips Solicitors

Lawbridge ? Practice Manager (wife) to become shareholder; Sole practitioner Nicola Phillips ? mother to become partner.

?

Source: Solicitors Regulation Authority/IRN Research

?

Related posts:

  1. Delays for Alternative Business Structures (ABSs) but Outcome Focused Regulations (OFR) are just around the corner
  2. Uncertain Future For The Legal Market But Still Opportunities For Innovative Firms
  3. May 25th 2012 ? CoreLegal Seminar Focuses On Business Growth for High Street Law firms

Source: http://www.corelegal.net/alternative-business-structures-abs-high-street-and-specialist-firms-grasp-the-opportunities/

amazing race maya angelou mary kay ash tiny houses bon iver joan of arc tony robbins

CNN takes down 'hormones' voting story after backlash

Thinkstock.comA CNN.com story headlined "Do hormones drive women's votes?" sparked a social media backlash that lasted for seven hours Wednesday before the network removed the post late that night.

The story, posted in the website's medical and health section Wednesday afternoon, began, "There's something that may raise the chances for both presidential candidates that's totally out of their control: women's ovulation cycles."

The story cited a new study to be published in "Psychological Science"?by Kristina Durante, an assistant professor in the department of marketing at the University of Texas San Antonio and the study's main author. Durante's online surveys of several-hundred women led her to conclude that, when they are ovulating, single women espouse more liberal beliefs, while married or committed women gravitate towards more conservative views.

(The same journal published a study in October concluding that the more muscular a man is, the more likely he is to support government policies that serve his self interest, such as low taxes for the rich if he is wealthy.)

CNN said Durante hypothesized that single women "feel sexier" when ovulating and thus "lean more toward liberal attitudes on abortion and marriage equality." Married women, trying to resist their "sexy" feelings, do the opposite.

Durante wrote in an email to Yahoo News that there were some "misunderstandings" of her research in the CNN piece, but did not elaborate.

A barrage of women took to Twitter to mock the premise that women vote with their hormones and wondered why a similar story was not written about the biochemical changes of men and how they affect their votes.

"When I ovulate I'm all 'DEFICIT SPENDING SPURS THE ECONOMY' but when I'm not I want to privatize Social Security," joked one?of the thousands of people to weigh in on the story there.

The author of the CNN post, Elizabeth Landeau, defended the story, writing on Twitter that it was a peer-reviewed study and that she included skepticism from political scientists.?Landeau quoted Paul Kellstedt, for instance, associate professor of political science at Texas A&M University, who said that the study leaves out that men's behavior is also affected by biochemical changes.?Another political scientist, Susan Carroll of Rutgers, was quoted saying the difference between voting preferences of married and single women is better explained by the difference in their economic statuses and other non-hormonal factors.

When CNN took down the post it appended a note that read, "Some elements of the story did not meet the editorial standards of CNN," but did not specify which elements were not up to snuff. A spokesman there hasn't yet responded to Yahoo News's request for comment.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/cnn-takes-down-hormones-drive-women-votes-story-152048023.html

jon hamm heather morris ncaa bracket predictions jeff foxworthy the bachelor finale march madness bracket south by southwest